Mackenzie Mcdonald vs Kamil Majchrzak Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
Wojtek Kolan
Published on 01 Mar at 10:56 PM UTC
HEAD TO HEAD
M. Mcdonald vs K. Majchrzak

USA
2
Win
Played
0
Win

POL
2
Win
Played
0
Win
Head-to-head: Mcdonald 2 - 0 Majchrzak
They have played 5 sets in total, with Mackenzie Mcdonald winning 4 and Kamil Majchrzak winning 1. The last match between Mackenzie Mcdonald and Kamil Majchrzak was at the San Diego Challenger, 01-03-2025, Round: SF, Surface: Hard, with Mackenzie Mcdonald getting the victory 3-6 6-1 6-1.
| Players | Head To Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Mcdonald | 2 |
| Majchrzak | 0 |
Last 2 H2H Matches:
(SF) San Diego Challenger(03-01-25)
(R2) Seoul Challenger(05-03-18)
M. Mcdonald vs K. Majchrzak H2H Profile
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| $3,450,170 | Career Prize Money | $1,651,370 |
| 55.94% (353-278) | Career Total W/L | 64.06% (435-244) |
| 2 | Hard | 0 |
| 6 | Titles | 20 |
| 2 | Total H2H Matches | 0 |
| 37.04% (10-17) | YTD Win/Loss | 53.57% (15-13) |
M. Mcdonald vs K. Majchrzak Match Preview:
Have you ever wondered how important the second serve performance is in tennis? Well, if we look at Majchrzak and Mcdonald, we find that Majchrzak inches slightly ahead, winning 44.43% of second serve points in recent months compared to Mcdonald’s 43.86%. Such stats frequently correlate strongly with the likelihood of coming out on top in matches. So, in this battle of the serves, will Majchrzak’s slight edge make a significant difference? Only time will tell.
When examining the art of returning serves, Majchrzak and Mcdonald are virtually tied. While Majchrzak has secured 45.22% of their rivals' second serve points, Mcdonald has a marginal lead at 45.28%. Their prowess on first serve returns is similarly close, with Majchrzak at 24.69% and Mcdonald close behind at 24.5%. These stats are insightful when forecasting who holds the upper hand in this head-to-head encounter.
Pressure moments in a match can be pivotal. Majchrzak triumphs in saving break points 57.06% of the time, whereas Mcdonald manages 52.5%. Such figures are handy for those considering in-game betting and attempting to predict pivotal turning points.
Over the past year, Majchrzak has clinched victory in 72.46% of their matches, whereas Mcdonald has been successful in 59.68%. These figures provide a broader perspective on their overall head-to-head prediction. In terms of surfaces, Majchrzak shines on clay with a 66% win rate, though struggles more on indoor hard courts (54%), whereas Mcdonald's forte is the hard courts with a 59% win percentage, but he falters on clay (39%).
The competitive level of play matters too. Last year, Majchrzak took part mostly in Challengers/ITF tournaments, winning 74% of the time, while Mcdonald wasn't too far behind, achieving a win rate of 72.73% in the same series. This context helps assess the strength of their opponents and assists in adjudging their respective form levels.
Direct comparisons tell an interesting tale: in their sole prior encounter, Mcdonald bested Majchrzak in straight sets. The contest took place on a hard court at the 2018 Seoul Challenger, concluding at 6-3, 6-4. The match history between the two portrays an average duration of 1 hour, 42 minutes, and they have yet to battle in a tiebreak or a deciding set. Furthermore, Mcdonald has faced tougher competition, with opponents averaging a rank of 202.18 compared to Majchrzak's 291.1.
If we delve into deciding sets statistics, this is where Majchrzak excels, winning 75% of these intense clashes over the past year, dwarfing Mcdonald’s 41% success rate in similar scenarios. Such details are invaluable for live predictions and betting nuances.
Also, analyzing break point conversions can be enlightening. Recently, Majchrzak has converted 23.02% of break point opportunities, barely trailing Mcdonald's 23.33% success rate. These numbers can provide insights for bettors to strategize during critical game moments.
So, who will claim victory based on these statistics? Given their prowess on various court surfaces, Majchrzak might have the edge, especially if it comes down to those crucial deciding moments. However, one cannot dismiss Mcdonald’s formidable track record on hard courts. It is indeed a close call, but if it boils down to vital last sets, the edge sways slightly in favor of Majchrzak. Stay tuned for what promises to be an intense contest!
Mackenzie Mcdonald vs Kamil Majchrzak Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.
M. Mcdonald vs K. Majchrzak H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2 | H2H Matches Won | 0 |
| 4 | Sets Won | 1 |
| 27 | Games Won | 15 |
| 12 | Aces (Total) | 2 |
| 7 | Total Double Faults | 8 |
| 1:43:54 | Average Match Time | 1:43:54 |
| 70% (85/122) | 1st Serve % | 54% (77/143) |
| 74% (63/85) | 1st Serve Win % | 58% (45/77) |
| 35% (13/37) | 2nd Serve Win % | 39% (26/66) |
| 46% (11/24) | Break Pts Won % | 33% (4/12) |
| 50% (72/143) | Return Points Win % | 38% (46/122) |
| 100% (2/2) | Best‑of‑3 Win % | 0% (0/2) |
| 100% (1/1) | Deciding Set Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/1) |
| 0% (0/1) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 100% (1/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (0/1) |
Recent Performance Stats
M. Mcdonald Recent Matches Played
| OPPONENT | RESULT | SCORE | H2H | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
R1 | L | 6-7(5) 7-6(3) 6-3 | ||
Q3 | W | 4-6 6-2 6-2 | ||
Q1 | W | 2-6 6-2 7-5 | ||
R2 | L | 7-6(2) 5-7 7-5 | ||
R1 | W | 6-3 7-6(6) | ||
K. Majchrzak Recent Matches Played
| OPPONENT | RESULT | SCORE | H2H | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
R1 | L | 7-6(4) 7-6(4) | ||
Q1 | L | 4-6 7-6(5) 7-6(4) | ||
R1 | L | 6-7(2) 6-3 7-6(7) | ||
Q3 | W | 6-4 7-5 | ||
Q1 | W | 6-4 6-4 | ||

M. Mcdonald vs K. Majchrzak Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 55.94% (353/278) | YTD Win/Loss | 64.06% (435/244) |
| 55.31% (849/686) | Sets Win/Loss | 61.65% (979/609) |
| 51.92% (7634/7070) | Games Win/Loss | 54.96% (8198/6719) |
| 58.72% (229/161) | Hard Win/Loss | 67.06% (114/56) |
| 37.10% (23/39) | Clay Win/Loss | 66.04% (247/127) |
| 57.14% (60/45) | Indoor Hard W/L | 52.17% (48/44) |
| 55.41% (41/33) | Grass Win/Loss | 60.47% (26/17) |
| 0.37 | Aces Per Game | 0.35 |
| 2633 | Aces Total | 2525 |
| 0.2 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.17 |
| 1432 | Total Double Faults | 1210 |
| 1:33:41 | Average Match Time | 1:21:36 |
| 407.97 | Average Opponent Rank | 477.71 |
| 63% (27359/43123) | 1st Serve % | 59% (24363/40959) |
| 70% (19126/27359) | 1st Serve Win % | 71% (17304/24363) |
| 51% (8101/15764) | 2nd Serve Win % | 52% (8661/16594) |
| 42% (1721/4077) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 44% (1914/4304) |
| 39% (17036/44007) | Return Points Win % | 41% (17008/41326) |
| 48.48% (32/34) | Slam W/L | 54.72% (29/24) |
| 47.25% (43/48) | Masters W/L | 46.43% (13/15) |
| 80.00% (4/1) | Cups W/L | 56.52% (13/10) |
| 48.92% (91/95) | Main Tour W/L | 52.17% (36/33) |
| 63.68% (142/81) | Challenger W/L | 63.25% (210/122) |
| 68.33% (41/19) | Futures W/L | 77.46% (134/39) |
| 57% (329/577) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 66% (417/635) |
| 42% (21/50) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 38% (12/32) |
| 50% (105/210) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 53% (115/215) |
| 46% (89/193) | Deciding Set Win % | 52% (101/196) |
| 80% (369/297) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 88% (443/390) |
| 20% (369/72) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 12% (443/52) |
| 21% (262/56) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 19% (236/46) |